Comparing Server Density vs Datadog
CEO & Founder of Server Density.
Published on the 12th March, 2017.
In 2009 I wrote the original version of the Server Density monitoring agent – sd-agent – designed to be lightweight and quick and easy to deploy. It was released under the FreeBSD open source license because I thought that if I was installing software onto my systems, I would at least want to have the ability to examine the source code! There weren’t any good SaaS server monitoring products, so I decided to build one.
In 2010, Datadog forked sd-agent into dd-agent and started building their company around the agent. Since then, they have grown very quickly, raised a huge amount of investment and added a lot of functionality to their product.
At the end of 2015 we released sd-agent v2, which was a merged version of dd-agent. We brought many of the improvements from the Datadog fork into the Server Density agent (although we decided to package plugins independently, rather than bundled into one distribution so you can maintain a lightweight installation and update components separately).
We think Server Density is a great alternative to Datadog, and there are a few features in particular which make Server Density vs Datadog an interesting comparison.
Tag based user permissions
Server Density uses tags to allow you to choose which users can have access to specific resources. You can add as many users as you wish and by using tags, you can control whether they can see particular servers and availability monitors. Uses for this range from reselling monitoring to your customers through to giving particular access to development teams whilst the operations team maintain a complete overview.
Slackbot for chatops
Our Slackbot allows you to ask questions about the state of your systems. Request graphs and check alerts from within Slack.
Website and API availability monitoring
By running monitoring nodes in locations all over the world, you can use Server Density to quickly configure HTTP and TCP availability checks to monitor website, application and API response time and uptime. We run the monitoring locations for you, so you can get an external perspective of your customer experience.
We have monitoring locations in: Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, UK and USA.
We started the HumanOps community in 2016 to encourage the operations community to discuss the human aspects of running infrastructure. This has resulted in events around the world, including the UK, US, France, Germany, Poland and more. Companies such as Spotify, PagerDuty, Yelp and Facebook have contributed to sharing ideas and best practices for life on call, dealing with technical debt, fatigue and stress.
Not only that, but we’re building features inspired by HumanOps, such as our Alert Costs functionality that reports on how much time alerts are wasting for your team.
We’re building more functionality to help teams implement HumanOps principles in their own company – a journey unique to Server Density.
Try Server Density
These are the key features we think makes us stand out when comparing Server Density vs Datadog but the best way is to try the product yourself!
Whether you’re after a less complex alternative like Firebox were, or whether you don’t want to have to deal with managing your own open source monitoring like furryLogic, Server Density is a great choice.